RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04833
COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code be changed from 6T, which denotes Air
National Guard (ANG) Unsatisfactory Participant/Potential
Unsatisfactory Participant to an eligible code that will allow
him to serve in the ANG.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes the status on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation
and Record of Service is erroneous due to the Base Realignment
and Closure (BRAC) of his unit in 2007.
He was never provided a copy of his NGB Form 22, nor was he
present to sign it. The BRAC caused him to leave his duty
station and feels that he served with honor and integrity during
his short period of service.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty; NGB Form 22 and various other documents associated with
his request.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicants NGB Form 22, Report of Separation
and Record of Service, on 22 Jun 06, he enlisted into the ANG.
He is credited with 3 years, 4 months and 22 days of service
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. The applicant did not complete his
military service obligation which led to his discharge. AFI 36-
3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for ANG and Air Force
Reserve Members, states if a member has not fulfilled their
military service obligation they may be discharged for
unsatisfactory participation when the commander concerned has
determined that the individual has no potential for useful
service under conditions of full mobilization. Member may be
discharged when the member has accumulated nine of more
unexcused absences from Unit Training Assemblies within a 12-
month period.
The applicants ANG unit provided attendance rosters and
confirmed he was absent for numerous drills; therefore, his
claim is invalid.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANTS REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 Dec 13, for review and comment with 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04833 in Executive Session on 8 Jul 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 13.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PP dated 22 Nov 13.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03156 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant submitted a DD Form 214 and while her entire ANG time is supported by her enlistment document, and Discharge Certificate, only certain periods of active duty are authorized to be entered on the DD Form 214. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that the applicants records should be corrected to show that he was reinstated to the grade of SSgt. Regarding...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01102
A1PP states that according to the NGB Form 22, the applicant was separated with a general, under honorable conditions discharge due to misconduct. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01215
On 4 Dec 02, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendation for discharge and the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service and a reason for discharge of conduct prejudicial to good order in Feb 03. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He submits a personal statement describing some of the harassment...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027
On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00021
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard as a Reserve of the Air Force, the term of enlistment for all non- prior service (NPS) applicants will be for a period of six years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00021
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard as a Reserve of the Air Force, the term of enlistment for all non- prior service (NPS) applicants will be for a period of six years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00614
Giving the circumstances surrounding the reason for his separation coupled with his honorable service characterization, we believe that a good probability exists that he may be able to provide effective and meaningful service to our nation as a member of the armed forces. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 10, he was discharged with a RE code of 3K (Secretarial Authority). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00803
The complete A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was denied promotion because the MS ANG reneged on his assignment orders without advising him just weeks after arriving on station. The resource to promote him to the grade of SMSgt as reflected on his orders was taken away when another member was placed in his position. ...